The unnecessary atomic bomb
The decision to use the atomic bomb first if you're searching for a well written book that supports the belief that dropping the bombs was unnecessary keep . It was unnecessary to bomb nagasaki because the us had already demonstrated their superiority with the first atomic bomb, they’d destroyed a key military base and they’d already killed more . Seventy years ago on aug 6, 1945, world war ii became a nuclear war when an atomic bomb leveled hiroshima, japan, and the world changed forever three days later, an atomic bomb destroyed the .
One of the greatest controversies to come out of world war ii was whether the atomic bomb was necessary to bring about its end unnecessary to win the war or that . The decision to use the atomic bomb: arguments in support note: this section is intended as an objective overview of the decision to use the atomic bomb for new students of the issue for the other side of the issue, go here. Atomic bomb: atomic bomb, weapon with great explosive power that results from splitting the nuclei of a heavy metal such as plutonium or uranium.
Was the atomic bomb necessary history essay post atomic bomb prediction estimates have claimed the possibility of up to a million casualties in the a us . In august of 1945, the decision was made to drop the atomic bomb on japan, causing two cities, hiroshima and nagasaki, to become pillars of history and examples of the devastation the bomb can cause the reason for the attack was to end world war ii, but many people argue that it was completely unnecessary and cruel. For example: the commander in chief of the us fleet and chief of naval operations, ernest j king, stated that the naval blockade and prior bombing of japan in march of 1945, had rendered the japanese helpless and that the use of the atomic bomb was both unnecessary and immoral. An unnecessary evil: the dual atomic bombs dropped on hiroshima and nagasaki the range of these pre-atomic bomb figures is significantly less than . All ethical issues aside, do you feel it was militarily necessary to drop the atomic bomb on japan some generals felt it was not necessary among them were general macarthur and general eisenhower.
The usage of the atomic bomb was effective, but at the same time devastating and unnecessary the united states should not have dropped the atomic bomb because it maimed countless of japanese civilians, caused radiation poisoning whose effects impacted future generations, left both cities in ruins, left citizens homeless, and it was absolutely . The decision to use the atomic bomb lead to a long and unnecessary campaign of attrition that would be extremely costly to both sides  the development . By doug long to see an article about whether the atomic bombing of hiroshima was necessary, click article for a summary of the above article, click summary . Was hiroshima necessary why the atomic bombings could have been avoided by mark weber on august 6, 1945, the world dramatically entered the atomic age: without either warning or precedent, an american plane dropped a single nuclear bomb on the japanese city of hiroshima.
The unnecessary atomic bomb
The atomic bomb accomplished truman's primary objective the attack on hiroshima finally convinced hirohito that the war must end, and his long-delayed conclusion was the decisive step in bringing . After the hiroshima atomic bombing, the japanese army and navy had sent separate teams of scientists to determine what type of bomb had destroyed the city by august 11th, both teams had reported to tokyo that the bomb was, indeed, atomic (sigal, pg 236). A huge expanse of ruins left by the explosion of the atomic bomb on aug 6, 1945 in hiroshima (ap) we didn’t need to drop the bomb — and even our ww ii military icons knew it.
- Before anyone gets upset and rages at me for having an opinion that classes with their own, i have been assigned to write an essay on why the dropping of the bomb on hiroshima was unnecessary, regardless of what my own opinion is.
- Putting matters in a broader framework to understand the atomic bombing, we should ask: would any civilized, powerful nation that had the a-bomb in world war ii not have used it against a hated enemy.
- The nation is reader supported: commander of the us third fleet, stated publicly in 1946 that “the first atomic bomb was an unnecessary experiment it was a mistake to ever drop it .
Was the bombing of nagasaki unnecessary to the extent that the atomic bombing was critically important to the japanese decision to surrender would it have been . For these reasons many arguments have been made that the use of the atomic bomb were unnecessary there is no way we can know for certain whether another approach would have ended the pacific war sooner and with fewer deaths. Days like no other: the dropping of the atomic bombs august 6, 1945 and august 9, 1945 were days in history like no other only one country in history has ever used an atomic bomb against another nation the united states of america. Was the atomic bombing of japan necessary and dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary those are not the words of a latter-day revisionist historian or a .